terdapat beberapa tips untuk memuji kanak2.
Salah satu rancangan kegemaran ak,
HonmaDekka TV yang ke udara setiap hari Rabu jam 2100 ini menghimpunkan
beberapa pakar akademik dari pelbagai bidang daripada psychology
sehingga ke neurology untuk membahaskan penemuan terbaru dalam bidang
masing-masing.. Baru-baru ini ak terpanggil untuk berkongsi dalam entri
kali ini tentang isu memuji kanak-kanak dengan betul.. Kajian yang
dijalankan oleh Claudia M. Mueller dan Carol S. Dweck daripada Columbia
University ini diterbitkan pada tahun 1998; namun masih ramai termasuk
ibu bapa sendiri masih melakukan "kesilapan" yang sama dalam memuji
anak-anak anda.. Pernah terfikir kenapa ramai yang sejak kecil dilabel
genius atau bijak tapi bila besar ramai yang lingkup? Mungkin salah satu
faktornya boleh didapati melalui maklumat dibawah:
*************************************************************
...In her own research,
Dweck has shown that these mindsets have important practical
implications. Her most famous study, conducted in twelve different New
York City schools along with Claudia Mueller, involved giving more than
400 fifth graders a relatively easy test consisting of nonverbal
puzzles. After the children finished the test, the researchers told the
students their score, and provided them with a single line of praise.
Half of the kids were praised for their intelligence. “You must be smart at this,” the researcher said. The other students were praised for their effort: “You must have worked really hard.”
The
students were then allowed to choose between two different subsequent
tests. The first choice was described as a more difficult set of
puzzles, but the kids were told that they’d learn a lot from attempting
it. The other option was an easy test, similar to the test they’d just
taken.
When
Dweck was designing the experiment, she expected the different forms of
praise to have a rather modest effect. After all, it was just one
sentence. But it soon became clear that the type of compliment given to
the fifth graders dramatically affected their choice of tests. When kids
were praised for their effort, nearly 90 percent chose the harder set
of puzzles. However, when kids were praised for their intelligence, most
of them went for the easier test. What explains this difference?
According to Dweck, praising kids for intelligence encourages them to “look” smart, which means that they shouldn’t risk making a mistake.
Dweck’s
next set of experiments showed how this fear of failure can actually
inhibit learning. She gave the same fifth graders yet another test. This
test was designed to be extremely difficult — it was originally written
for eighth graders — but Dweck wanted to see how the kids would respond
to the challenge. The students who were initially praised for their
effort worked hard at figuring out the puzzles. Kids praised for their smarts, on the other hand, were easily discouraged.
Their inevitable mistakes were seen as a sign of failure: Perhaps they
really weren’t so smart. After taking this difficult test, the two
groups of students were then given the option of looking either at the
exams of kids who did worse or those who did better. Students
praised for their intelligence almost always chose to bolster their
self-esteem by comparing themselves with students who had performed
worse on the test. In contrast, kids praised for their hard work were
more interested in the higher-scoring exams. They wanted to understand
their mistakes, to learn from their errors, to figure out how to do
better.
The final round of tests was the same difficulty level as the initial test. Nevertheless,
students who were praised for their effort exhibited significant
improvement, raising their average score by 30 percent.
Because these kids were willing to challenge themselves, even if it
meant failing at first, they ended up performing at a much higher level.
This result was even more impressive when compared to students randomly assigned to the smart group, who saw their scores drop by nearly 20 percent. The experience of failure had been so discouraging for the “smart” kids that they actually regressed.
The
problem with praising kids for their innate intelligence — the “smart”
compliment — is that it misrepresents the psychological reality of
education. It encourages kids to avoid the most useful kind of learning activities, which is when we learn from our mistakes.
Because unless we experience the unpleasant symptoms of being wrong —
that surge of Pe activity a few hundred milliseconds after the error,
directing our attention to the very thing we’d like to ignore — the mind
will never revise its models. We’ll keep on making the same mistakes,
forsaking self-improvement for the sake of self-confidence. Samuel
Beckett had the right attitude: “Ever tried. Ever failed. No matter. Try
Again. Fail again. Fail better.”
**************************************************************
Narrated `A’ishah:
The Prophet took a child in his lap ... and then the child urinated on
him, so he asked for water and poured it over the place of the urine.
Embarrassed, the father sprang forward. "What have you done, you silly
boy?" he shouted. He shoved his arm forward to grab the child away from
Muhammad, his red face showing his anger. Fear and confusion showed in
the face of the child. Muhammad (SAW) restrained the man, and gently
hugged the child to him. "Don’t worry," he told the over-zealous father.
"This is not a big issue. My clothes can be washed. But be careful with how you treat the child," he continued. "What can restore his self-esteem after you have dealt with him in public like this?".
***************************************************************
0 comments:
Post a Comment